Bill C-233, Press Conference on Banning Sex-Selective Abortion

Dr. Kiely Williams

It is my pleasure to speak in support of MP Wagantall’s Bill C 233.

I support this Bill as a woman, a mother, a physician and a Canadian.

Sex selective abortion is recognized by the United Nations as a form of gender based violence. Death is universally accepted as the ultimate harm in gender based violence. The UN has called female infanticide and pre natal sex selection “harmful and unethical” practices.

In 2011 they released an inter agency statement that called sex selective abortions an unacceptable manifestation of gender discrimination against girls and women and a violation of their human rights. They called on member states to end this practice. Canada is over a decade late in responding to this monumental call to protect the right to life for women and girls.

Currently, Canada is a country that allows physicians to terminate girls simply because they are girls. Worldwide this has led to an estimated 140 to 160 million missing girls.

In 2007, the Executive of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) issued a statement that medical technologies for the sole purpose of gender identification in pregnancy should not be used to accommodate societal preferences, and that the SOGC does not support termination of pregnancy on the basis of gender.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, as well as British Columbia and Saskatchewan, have also echoed the SOGC’s view.

This Bill allows Canada to send a clear message that we oppose the idea that girls do not deserve to live simply because they are girls. All political parties must stand up for the equality of women and men. Having sex selective abortions clearly defined in the criminal code as an unacceptable violation of human rights is critical in protecting girls.

It is very rare in politics when we are presented with a Bill that all parties can support. There are no Canadian political parties who do not support a women’s right to life in Canada.

The time to send this clear message is now. We must act before more female lives are lost.


Recent Posts

You Might Also Like

  • good to exist
    By Published On: April 14th, 2023Categories: Abortion, Euthanasia, Genetic discrimination

    Is It Good To Exist After All? Abortion, genetic discrimination, euthanasia — these are just some of the issues of our time that lead people to a general sense of precariousness about whether it is good to exist.  These practices involve actions that are tantamount to saying, “I do not want you to be.”

  • By Published On: March 17th, 2023Categories: Euthanasia, News

    The people who will survive this year In 2021, the Canadian government passed Bill C-7 to expand euthanasia to persons whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. The new law excluded those whose sole condition is a mental illness but only for two years, until March 17, 2023. We have got to stop using

  • Grasping for Rituals
    By Published On: March 8th, 2023Categories: End of Life Care, Euthanasia, News

    Grasping for RitualYesterday, CBC published this narrative piece by Nellwyn Lampert in which she reflects on the toll that her grandmother’s euthanasia death took on her. Lampert recounts how her husband poured some wine for her as they sat in the living room anticipating her grandmother’s death in a nearby hospital scheduled for 5 p.m. It is

Follow US:

Want to become a member?


Vital Bylines: Get news and opportunities weekly from CPL.