John’s prognosis was challenging. Look at him now!

No Infant Euthanasia

Dear Committee members,

We strongly object to Dr. Louis Roy’s suggestion that Canada should expand the euthansia/MAiD criteria to include infants from newborns to 1-year-olds.

Medicine needs to be humble enough to admit that it doesn’t have all the answers when a life-limiting prognosis is given to an individual. We do not and cannot foresee exactly what a child’s quality of life will be in a few years and it is misplaced compassion to suggest that ending the child’s life constitutes care.

In our experience there is no way for parents to reasonably adjudicate whether ending their child’s life is legitimate. Even the idea of this places immense pressure and unjust guilt on parents for the suffering of their children and families. Furthermore, we know that much physical suffering can be dramatically alleviated through proper palliative care

Expanding euthanasia to infants violates the principle of autonomy which was supposed to be essential to this law in Canada. . We are warning that this opens the door to prematurely ending the lives of persons with intellectual disabilities or other cognitive impairments.

Finally, it further devalues persons with disabilities. Nobody deserves to have a question mark over their life because the society in which they live has deemed their lives optional from the outset. This is unacceptable in the free and inclusive society we seek to promote.

We will not abandon children and their families who suffer.

Open Letter to the Special Joint Committee

Please sign this Open Letter to the Committee Members asking them to reject infant euthanasia

Share this with your friends:

     

*Please keep me informed about this and other campagins from Canadian Physicians for Life.

Categories

Recent Posts

You Might Also Like

  • Loving the sick and dying

    By: Nicole Scheidl on July 17, 2023

    To Treat And Care For The Sick And Dying A recent article in The Globe & Mail stokes a full-blown demonization of Catholic healthcare institutions for not killing the elderly, sick, and disabled Canadians who ask for it. The author begins by denigrating the fact that faith-based institutions receive public funding. It's a rather

  • By: Nicole Scheidl on June 15, 2023

    Does Suffering Shock You? Yesterday, I read this article titled, “Does Suffering Shock You?” In it, the author says, “If we are repulsed by suffering, we will try to eliminate it at all costs, including eliminating the person who suffers.” While most medical professionals are thoroughly acquainted with human suffering, it may still be

  • good to exist

    By: Nicole Scheidl on April 14, 2023

    Is It Good To Exist After All? Abortion, genetic discrimination, euthanasia — these are just some of the issues of our time that lead people to a general sense of precariousness about whether it is good to exist.  These practices involve actions that are tantamount to saying, “I do not want you to be.”

Follow US:

Want to become a member?

YOUR HELP GOES A LONG WAY!

Vital Bylines: Get news and opportunities weekly from CPL.